Neurofactor
Back to the knowledge base
Motivation and drivers

What are a target group’s wants and goals?

Explore what your target group wants to achieve. Separate wants, functional goals and psychological outcomes, with interview questions and a profile example.

Martijn den Otter9/22/2026
What are a target group’s wants and goals?

‘More growth’, ‘greater peace of mind’ and ‘better decisions’ can all appear in a target group profile. Yet they do not tell you what someone wants to achieve, when it matters or how they would recognise progress. The Wants and goals field describes the outcomes the target group seeks. A useful entry connects a functional result with a desired psychological outcome, where both have been investigated. It gives research and communication direction without turning a customer aspiration into a product promise.

What are wants and goals in a target group profile?

Wants and goals describe which outcomes a target group finds attractive and intends to pursue within a specific choice context. A want expresses a preference for an outcome; a goal involves an intention to attain an outcome. Whether action follows requires separate evidence.

Record what should change in practical terms and what that change means to the person. State the context, priority and evidence basis. An expressed want does not establish purchase intention, willingness to pay or your offering's ability to deliver the outcome.

How do a want, a goal and an approach differ?

ConceptQuestion it answersFictional example
WantWhich outcome is attractive?Less doubt about an important choice
GoalWhich outcome does someone intend to pursue?Prepare an informed choice before the budget meeting
Functional goalWhat needs to happen or change in practice?Compare two propositions against agreed criteria
Desired psychological outcomeWhat does someone want to experience or understand?Explain the trade-offs with confidence
ApproachWhich actions might contribute?Put research findings and limitations into a comparison
Purchase intentionIs there an intention to buy something?Intend to commission a research project

This is the practical classification used in the profile. The same word can have several meanings. ‘Control’ might mean being able to check information or feeling less dependent on others. Ask what the outcome means before assigning a psychological interpretation.

Which scientific ideas inform this field?

Locke and Latham discuss goals as outcomes towards which action is directed. Their research overview also addresses conditions including commitment, feedback and task complexity. Locke & Latham, 2002

Gollwitzer distinguishes intending to achieve a goal from an implementation plan linking a situation to an action. Gollwitzer, 1999

Ryan and Deci describe autonomy, competence and relatedness as basic psychological needs within self-determination theory. Ryan & Deci, 2000

These publications provide theoretical background. Combining a functional goal with a desired psychological outcome is Neurofactor's practical writing convention here, not a separately validated scale. Do not automatically classify a statement as a basic need or derive an individual score from it.

Why distinguish a functional goal from a psychological outcome?

A functional goal identifies what should happen: support a choice with evidence, complete a schedule or solve a problem. The desired psychological outcome describes what the person wants to experience, such as clarity or confidence. Both can matter, but neither establishes the other.

First ask about the result, then its meaning: ‘What would change for you if this worked?’ Let respondents say whether they mean peace of mind, recognition, room to act or something else. Record ‘not investigated’ when this layer is missing.

The profile describes the target group's goal. ‘More enquiries for our business’ is a supplier goal. ‘Find a suitable supplier without repeating three selection processes’ could be a customer goal. Keep the perspectives separate.

How does this connect to other profile fields?

FieldIts specific role in the profile
Wants and goalsOutcomes someone intends to pursue
Values and visionPrinciples and beliefs someone considers important
Emotional driversEmotional meaning that helps direct the pursuit
Main pain pointThe problem currently experienced
Desired situationThe overall future state in which the main problem has changed
BenefitsWhat a solution can contribute in practical terms
Emotional benefitThe desired emotional return from that contribution

Use Wants and goals as the reference for the intended result. Develop each other field from its own perspective. Confidence can then appear as a desired outcome and as an emotional benefit without repeating the same sentence throughout. This is an editorial convention, not a claim that one psychological process always takes precedence.

How do you research wants and goals?

  1. 1Choose one choice context. Discuss the last supplier selection, for example, rather than all business ambitions at once.
  2. 2Start with a concrete experience. Ask: ‘What were you trying to achieve at that point?’
  3. 3Make the outcome recognisable. Ask how the person would know it had worked. A criterion can be qualitative; not every goal needs a percentage.
  4. 4Explore its meaning. Ask what the result would change for them without suggesting an emotion.
  5. 5Ask about priorities and trade-offs. What takes precedence when speed, quality and cost cannot all improve together?
  6. 6Check intention and behaviour. What step has been taken, planned or postponed? Keep statements, plans and observed actions distinct.
  7. 7Preserve origins and differences. Link the summary to source material and record differing goals within the group.

Why broad agreement tells you little

Do not only ask ‘Would you like more certainty?’ People can agree without making the same choice. Ask what certainty means in this situation and what they would trade for it. The answer remains a statement; where possible, examine how it relates to actual decisions.

Example: from a broad aspiration to a useful profile entry

Fictional illustration; not a customer quotation or research finding. A marketing lead needs to choose between two propositions before a budget meeting.

The initial statement is: ‘I want more certainty.’ Further questions clarify the functional goal: ‘I want to compare the two options using the same criteria.’ The desired psychological outcome is: ‘I want to explain the trade-offs with confidence.’

A compact profile sentence becomes: ‘Wants to compare two propositions against agreed criteria before the budget meeting, to explain the choice with confidence.’

This does not mean research can guarantee certainty. Nor does it establish a preference for EEG, a questionnaire or any other method. The outcome comes first; the appropriate approach and supporting evidence require separate investigation.

If only the broad aspiration was actually expressed, do not present the developed sentence as an established insight. Keep it as a hypothesis for a later conversation. The deadline belongs to this fictional situation, not to every marketing lead.

What if goals conflict or several matter?

A target group may value speed and thoroughness. Describe the trade-off within the actual situation rather than listing everything as equally important. For example: ‘Wants to decide quickly, provided the main uncertainties remain visible.’ Such a sentence also needs evidence.

Separate organisational and personal goals. A leadership team may seek cost control while a user wants less manual work. Both concern the same purchase, but should not necessarily be attributed to the same person or target group.

Include a deadline or numerical criterion when the data justify it. Do not artificially quantify an exploratory aspiration after the fact. When circumstances change, record when the goal was established and whether it is still relevant.

What do goals tell you about an associative target group?

Under Neurofactor's working definition, similar associations guide decisions within a specific choice context. A shared goal can help explain that context, but is insufficient by itself to establish one associative target group.

Two people might both want an informed choice. One might associate an external expert with trust, while the other associates trust with information they can check personally. This is a fictional contrast to clarify the research question. Investigate whether such patterns actually occur and how they relate to choices.

Do not derive BIS/BAS scores or other neuropsychological values directly from words such as ambition, certainty or peace of mind. A goal description and a psychological measurement are different data.

How do you write the compact profile sentence?

Start with: ‘Wants to achieve [functional outcome] in [choice context], so that [researched personal meaning or psychological outcome].’

Add a deadline, condition or trade-off when it is essential and supported. Omit the second half if the personal meaning has not been investigated. Source, date, target group boundaries and evidence status need not all fit into one sentence, but must remain linked to it.

In the underlying documentation, distinguish literal respondent answers, summaries across answers, measured behaviour and researcher interpretations. Polished wording does not turn an interpretation into an observation.

A goal provides direction, not a guarantee

A useful entry describes what the target group seeks, in which context and why it matters to them. Make functional outcome, psychological meaning and priority visible where researched. Keep the description separate from purchase intention and product promises. The same goal statement can then inform the rest of the profile consistently.

About the sources

Relevant passages were consulted in PDF versions of the original publications. They provide theoretical background for the stated concepts. The interview steps, field distinctions and profile sentence are our applications; no conversion effects or measured customer goals are inferred from these sources.

Sources checked on 22 September 2026. The practical example and its statements are fictional. Writing conventions and interview guidance are Neurofactor applications.

Discuss your target group question

Would you like to understand the outcomes your target group seeks and the associations guiding its choices? Discuss with Neurofactor how to investigate them.

Key terms

Wants and goals
The outcomes a target group finds attractive and intends to pursue within a specific choice context.
Functional goal
The practical result that should happen or change, separate from what it means to the person.
Desired psychological outcome
What someone wants to experience or understand when the result is achieved, investigated separately from the functional goal.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a want and a goal?

A want describes an attractive outcome; a goal involves an intention to pursue an outcome. Whether someone acts and achieves the result requires separate evidence.

Does every goal need a number and a deadline?

No. Use a deadline or number when supported by the context and data. A qualitative criterion can also clarify when the goal has been achieved. Do not invent precision to make the profile seem more concrete.

Is a psychological goal the same as an emotional driver?

Not in this profile classification. The psychological goal describes the desired experience; an emotional driver describes the emotional meaning directing the pursuit. They can be related but need their own explanation and evidence.

Does an expressed want prove someone intends to buy?

No. A desired outcome is not a purchase intention. Investigate separately whether someone intends to act, which alternatives they consider and whether they have scope to make a purchase.

Does everyone with the same goal form one associative target group?

No. Neurofactor's working definition concerns similar associations guiding decisions in the same choice context. People with the same goal can have different associations and trade-offs.

What should I enter if goals have not yet been researched?

Record ‘not yet investigated’ or label a statement as a hypothesis. Link it to a concrete research question. Do not present a desired outcome of your own offering as an established customer goal.

Sources

  1. 1.Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705. - American Psychologist (2002)
  2. 2.Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493. - American Psychologist (1999)
  3. 3.Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68. - American Psychologist (2000)

Related topics

Reviewed by: Martijn den Otter · Last reviewed: 9/22/2026

Martijn den Otter

Martijn den Otter

Oprichter van Neurofactor. Expert in neuromarketing en consumentenpsychologie.

LinkedIn →